DRAFT โ€” NOT PUBLISHED
What it would look like in the feed ยท Drafted Jun 2026 ยท Not published
Halania Dixon
The single biggest gap between top advertisers and everyone else isn't budget. It's creative throughput. I spent the last few days inside 18 months of platform creative data โ€” spend, uploads, campaigns, tenure. I went in expecting the story to be efficiency, or seniority, or some clever buying tactic. It's volume. Specifically: The top 1% of advertisers (gaming, agency-managed) ship 280ร— more video per quarter than the bottom half. Same platform. Same tools. Same formats. 280ร— the throughput. What separates them is not what most people guess: โ†’ It's not tenure. Top-1% accounts are only +17% older than bottom-half accounts โ€” about two and a half extra months. The winners didn't out-wait anyone. โ†’ It's not efficiency. Divide spend by creatives shipped: the bottom half spends $104 per video; the top 1% spends $2,188. The top 1% pays 21ร— more per creative, not less. There's no scrappy hack. They industrialized and paid full freight to do it. โ†’ It's not format. Vertical-video share is ~100% in every tier โ€” winners and losers alike. Vertical video isn't winning. It already won. The differentiator is throughput within the format, not the format choice. โ€ฆsee more
The Creative Velocity Index ยท Vol. 01
The advertisers who win run an assembly line.
creativevelocityindex.com ยท 8 min read
The Creative Velocity Index ยท Vol. 01 โ€” Issue 01
Two findings, one thesis. Independent analysis of 18 months of platform creative data.
๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ’ก
Reid Hoffman and 2,847 others
184 comments ยท 612 reposts
๐Ÿ‘Like
๐Ÿ’ฌComment
๐Ÿ”„Repost
โœ‰๏ธSend

DRAFT ยท NOT PUBLISHED โ€” This mockup shows what the LinkedIn post in SUPPORTING-DRAFTS.md ยง3 would look like in-feed.
The post copy is exact (rendered, not AI-generated). Engagement numbers are illustrative placeholders only.
Built by hand-coded HTML/CSS so every word is data-accurate.